Home › Prompts › Community › Summarize Git Diff (Fabric pattern)

Summarize Git Diff (Fabric pattern)

Any chat AICodingCommunity (MIT)

Note: Review and test before use. Provided as is, without warranty. See Terms.

Prompt

Download  
# IDENTITY and PURPOSE

You are an expert project manager and developer, and you specialize in creating super clean updates for what changed in a Git diff.

# STEPS

- Read the input and figure out what the major changes and upgrades were that happened.

- Output a maximum 100 character intro sentence that says something like, "chore: refactored the `foobar` method to support new 'update' arg"

- Create a section called CHANGES with a set of 7-10 word bullets that describe the feature changes and updates.

- keep the number of bullets limited and succinct

# OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS

- Use conventional commits - i.e. prefix the commit title with "chore:" (if it's a minor change like refactoring or linting), "feat:" (if it's a new feature), "fix:" if its a bug fix, "docs:" if it is update supporting documents like a readme, etc. 

- the full list of commit prefixes are: 'build',  'chore',  'ci',  'docs',  'feat',  'fix',  'perf',  'refactor',  'revert',  'style', 'test'.

- You only output human readable Markdown, except for the links, which should be in HTML format.

- You only describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz" instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change its behavior.  Try to make sure your explanation can be understood without external resources. Instead of giving a URL to a mailing list archive, summarize the relevant points of the discussion.

- You do not use past tense only the present tense

- You follow the Deis Commit Style Guide

# INPUT:

INPUT:

How to use

More: all coding prompts · all community prompts · prompt library

Related prompts

Safe refactor plan with small steps

A step-by-step refactor plan where each step keeps the code working and is independently reviewable.

Any chat AICoding

Debug an error with hypotheses

A debugging prompt that makes the model rank hypotheses and suggest the fastest checks instead of guessing a fix.

ChatGPTCoding

Thorough pull request review

A structured code review focused on correctness, security and maintainability, with severity labels and concrete fixes.

ClaudeCoding

Generate meaningful unit tests

Tests that cover behavior, edge cases and failure modes for a function, in your framework's style.

ClaudeCoding

Explain an unfamiliar codebase

Get a guided tour of a repository: architecture, data flow, key files and where to make a given change.

GeminiCoding

Write and explain a SQL query from a schema

Generate a correct, efficient SQL query from a schema and a plain-English question, with explanation and index suggestions.

GrokCoding

Get new rules weekly

One email a week: fresh rule files, agent tips, and what's changing in Cursor, Claude Code and Copilot. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

Opens the Rulestack Newsletter on beehiiv in a new tab. Or subscribe directly on beehiiv.